[ Sending-service guides ]

Authenticate email sent through ClickDimensions: configuration and verification

Plan ClickDimensions Email Sending Domains with account-issued DNS, documented relaxed alignment and separate DNS verification and provider approval.

By the EmailAuth research team · 8 min read

[ Key points ]

  • The documented January 25, 2027 enforcement date is future relative to this review.
  • Waiting for Approval is not Approved or received-message proof.
  • The documented route requires relaxed SPF and DKIM alignment; organizational exceptions need an explicit decision.
On this page

Plan around the documented approval process and date

Click's official Email Sending Domains guide, edited October 6, 2026, describes configuring domains in ClickDimensions Marketing Automation. It announces that, starting January 25, 2027, emails can be sent only from domains with Approved status. As of this guide's November 9, 2026 review, that is a future announced restriction, not evidence that the new enforcement has already occurred in a tenant. Confirm the applicable version, account and current provider notices before planning a change.

The guide says each domain used in a From Email Address must be covered, including domains used by different brands or regions. Inventory the actual From addresses on Email Send records and Send Email actions in Campaign Automations. Do not assume the organization's main domain covers every configured sender. Account readiness depends on the actual domain list and approval states, neither of which has been inspected for this manuscript.

Keep DNS verification distinct from Approved status

The documented sequence includes Waiting for DNS Verification, Waiting for Approval and Approved. After the DNS records are verified, the domain still goes through Click's Change Management process. The guide describes weekly changeover windows, potentially taking up to seven days, and says DKIM publication is anticipated one to seven days after the waiting-for-approval stage. These are provider scheduling statements, not a promise of immediate activation or an independently verified service-level commitment.

Plan the DNS work early enough to leave room for that approval process and any corrections. A green DNS check should not be entered as Approved unless the domain's actual status says so. Record the contact mailbox responsible for provider questions and make sure an authorized person monitors it. This article does not open a support ticket, submit a domain for approval or claim that any change window has been booked.

Enter domain and subdomain fields with the correct scope

Navigate to ClickDimensions Settings and Email Sending Domains. The guide describes a sending domain, a DKIM subdomain, an optional Email CNAME and a Contact Email. The subdomain fields take labels rather than complete fully qualified names. The DKIM subdomain must be unique to Click, not reserved for another service or purpose, and use a valid label without leading or trailing punctuation. The DKIM and Email CNAME subdomains cannot use the same label. Review existing web-content and social CNAME dependencies as well instead of choosing a convenient label without checking ownership.

The optional Email CNAME is for email links; it is not interchangeable with the DKIM subdomain. Keep link branding, return-path configuration and signing evidence separate in the acceptance record. Use the account's generated values for the intended domain. Do not copy another brand's labels or targets because it already has an Approved status. Approval belongs to the configured identity and its records, not to a reusable DNS template.

After saving, the guide describes a possible organizational-domain SPF change, two new MX records and five new TXT records. Record the entire issued set and the purpose of each owner. These are not instructions to replace the organization's ordinary inbound MX records at the root. Review the exact generated owner names and routing dependencies with the DNS administrator before making any change.

Preserve the provider’s DNS formatting instructions

The guide warns about copy-and-paste formatting of its gears._domainkey entries, including line breaks, spaces and quotation marks introduced by email clients. It also says its three DKIM TXT values are 225, 225 and four characters and should be created without concatenation. Apply those instructions to the actual issued records rather than merging them into a single invented key value or assuming every TXT record has the same format.

A DNS editor's presentation is distinct from the logical data returned by DNS. RFC 6376, section 3.6.2.2 defines TXT resource records for DKIM key storage. Preserve provider-issued record boundaries and inspect the actual published data through an authorized process. A screenshot of a saved input box is not sufficient to establish that the public owner and value are correct.

The guide's Verify button checks that records exist and contain content. That scope is narrower than a complete received-message test. Keep the actual verification result, subsequent approval state and final signing evidence separate. If a record is wrong, correct the specific mismatch with the DNS owner rather than repeatedly submitting approval or replacing unrelated records.

Treat relaxed alignment as a product prerequisite

The official DMARC implementation guide, edited May 16, 2025, says Click's subdomain design does not support strict adkim or strict aspf. It requires relaxed values for both, either explicitly or through the corresponding defaults. Preserve this as a documented product constraint; do not soften it into an optional performance recommendation or say the account can use strict mode without additional evidence.

That does not authorize silently weakening an organization's existing domain policy. Identify the policy owner, other mail streams and intended security requirements. If the current policy conflicts with the documented product design, keep the implementation blocked pending an approved design decision or current provider clarification. No DMARC policy was changed here, and this guide does not claim an unsupported alternative configuration.

RFC 9989, section 4.4 defines the protocol's alignment rules. General protocol support for strict alignment does not mean every service implements a compatible route. Conversely, the provider's restriction does not mean strict alignment is impossible everywhere. Keep those two statements separate when documenting the acceptance decision. Do not treat an unrelated passing signature as aligned simply because the sending platform is trusted by the organization.

Review SPF and actual message identities together

The account-generated SPF instructions need review within the full legitimate-sender inventory. RFC 7208, sections 2.4, 3.2 and 4.6.4 define MAIL FROM, multiple SPF policy behavior and evaluated DNS-dependent term limits. Do not replace a working organizational policy with a single-service example or add a competing second SPF record. Review the actual return-path identity used by the approved route.

After separately authorized setup, a harmless acceptance message should establish the author domain, return-path domain, signature domain and selector, with trusted receiver results. RFC 6376, section 3.5 defines the signature fields. A provider-level default signature or a successful DNS verification alone is not evidence that a customer-domain route aligns. Authentication also does not guarantee inbox placement or campaign engagement.

Fictional diagnosis and blank acceptance worksheet

A fictional distributor, Birchline Tools, completes DNS verification for its second brand and schedules a campaign while the domain remains Waiting for Approval. The campaign team treats that intermediate state as equivalent to production readiness. The review identifies two missing decisions: completion of the provider change window and confirmation that the brand's DMARC alignment settings meet the documented product requirement.

The proposed correction is to retain the completed DNS evidence while keeping release open until the actual domain state and policy decision are resolved. It is not to bypass approval, alter the From address secretly or weaken policy without authorization. This fictional scenario contains no real tenant result, scheduled campaign or executed test.

  • Account version and all actual sending domains: ______
  • Generated DKIM subdomain, optional link domain and record set: ______
  • Existing dependencies and authoritative DNS approval: ______
  • Required relaxed adkim/aspf compatibility decision: ______
  • DNS Verify result, Waiting for Approval and Approved evidence: ______
  • Monitored contact and provider change-window planning: ______
  • Email Send and Campaign Automation From-domain checks: ______
  • Trusted message-level identities and alignment result: ______
  • Unresolved conditions, rollback owner and release decision: ______

Original implementation evidence, human subject-matter review, current applicability, production routes, visual accessibility and owner release remain open. No domain was submitted, DNS edited, policy changed or email sent. The catalogue's broader implementation requirement remains dependent on authorized account and message evidence.

[ Takeaway ]

Use the actual domain records and complete the approval workflow before treating a route as ready; keep message evidence and current account applicability open.

[ By role ]

What this means for you

Choose your role for practical next steps.

Marketing operations

Inventory every From domain

A domain omitted from the inventory can leave a scheduled route unprepared.

Next steps

  1. Review Email Send records and Campaign Automations.
  2. Record each domain and current approval state.

DNS administrator

Preserve issued record boundaries

Generated DNS values belong to the selected domain and workflow.

Next steps

  1. Review owner names and TXT boundaries.
  2. Keep DKIM and tracking labels distinct.

Security owner

Resolve alignment prerequisites

The provider route may conflict with a strict organizational policy.

Next steps

  1. Document the conflict.
  2. Approve a compatible route or leave release on hold.

[ FAQs ]

Frequently asked questions

Is the announced sending restriction already in force?

The October 6, 2026 article announces January 25, 2027. This November 9, 2026 manuscript does not treat that future date as completed enforcement.

ClickDimensions: Email Sending Domains (edited October 6, 2026)

Where are sending domains configured?

The documented entry point is ClickDimensions Settings, Email Sending Domains. Check the installed version and account before relying on the interface.

ClickDimensions: Email Sending Domains (edited October 6, 2026)

Is a DKIM Subdomain value a full hostname?

The field takes the subdomain part rather than the full domain. Its label must be unique to Click, valid and distinct from the specified CNAME uses.

ClickDimensions: Email Sending Domains (edited October 6, 2026)

Can the optional Email CNAME share that label?

No. The provider requires different labels for the DKIM subdomain and Email CNAME.

ClickDimensions: Email Sending Domains (edited October 6, 2026)

Does successful DNS verification finish approval?

No. Waiting for DNS Verification changes to Waiting for Approval; the documented weekly change process can take up to seven days to reach Approved.

ClickDimensions: Email Sending Domains (edited October 6, 2026)

Does Click support strict adkim or aspf on this route?

The cited provider guidance says neither strict mode is supported. Do not weaken an organizational policy without authorization; resolve the incompatibility before release.

ClickDimensions: Implementing DMARC for your organization (edited May 16, 2025)

Should the three documented DKIM TXT records be concatenated?

No. The guide specifies separate TXT strings of 225, 225 and 4 characters and says to create them without concatenation. Follow the actual generated owner names and values.

ClickDimensions: Email Sending Domains (edited October 6, 2026)

Have the domains or campaign settings been tested here?

No. This manuscript describes a proposed acceptance procedure. Actual account state, DNS, message results and owner approval remain open.

[ Sources ]

Sources

  1. RFC 9989: DMARC

    Sections §2.4 Out of Scope · §4.4 Identifier Alignment Explained · §5.3 Mail Receiver Actions

  2. RFC 6376: DKIM

    Sections §1 Introduction · §3.5 DKIM-Signature Header Field · §3.6.2.2 Resource Record Types for Key Storage

  3. RFC 7208: Sender Policy Framework

    Sections §2.3 The HELO Identity · §2.4 The MAIL FROM Identity · §3.1 DNS Resource Records · §3.2 Multiple DNS Records · §3.3 Multiple Strings in a Single DNS Record · §4.6.4 DNS Lookup Limits · §5.2 "include" · §5.3 "a" · §5.6 "ip4" and "ip6"

  4. ClickDimensions: Email Sending Domains (edited October 6, 2026)

    Sections Email Sending Domains Required Starting January 25, 2027 · Adding Email Sending Domains · Important notes for your DNS team · Verifying Email Sending Domains

  5. ClickDimensions: Implementing DMARC for your organization (edited May 16, 2025)

    Sections Does Click support DMARC strict adkim or strict aspf?

[ Glossary ]

Glossary

Email Sending Domain
The domain configuration used by Click to prepare sending identities and their approval.

ClickDimensions: Email Sending Domains (edited October 6, 2026)

Waiting for Approval
The documented intermediate state after DNS verification and before provider approval.

ClickDimensions: Email Sending Domains (edited October 6, 2026)

Relaxed alignment
DMARC alignment based on the applicable organizational-domain relationship rather than exact domain equality.

RFC 9989: DMARC

Contact Email
The address Click uses to contact the customer about domain-authentication issues.

ClickDimensions: Email Sending Domains (edited October 6, 2026)

Enterprise provenance

Why top financial institutions and governments retired their email security dashboards.

Traditional email authentication platforms sell you a dashboard and ask your engineers to do the labour. In high-stakes environments, manual oversight means delayed enforcement, configuration drift and unmonitored shadow domains.

EmailAuth is the agentic email provenance platform. Our agents enforce p=reject, keep third-party senders aligned and move your domains to full RFC 9989 compliance, the new DMARC standard,, with human-in-the-loop auditability.

Governments Large enterprises Tier-1 financial institutions

SaaS · Dedicated tenancy · Air-gapped on-prem · BYOK encryption

Knowledge Base